Review Criteria
At Gaia University we consider the design, implementation and outcomes of your output packets – which are the focal point of your evaluation – to be as important as the design, implementation and outcomes of the projects that they document.
We apply the same set of review criteria (contained in a rubric) to your output packets, across the entire review continuum. All of these criteria will be fully explained in the output packet review workshops.
- Presentation and organization (of output packets): structure, navigability, flow, quality of writing, use of media, creativity
- Design (of projects and output packets): articulation of approach, critical thinking and evaluation, balance and integration of research with original thinking/design
- Action learning (in projects and output packet production): concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, active experimentation
- Process skills (in project and output packet production): project management, gains in competence and attention, collaborative engagement, leadership and delegation skills
- Outcomes (of projects and output packets): strategic value, contribution of knowledge to the commons, development of professional skills, new insights and understanding attained, internal growth and development
Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.